If you listen to Democrats today, you will hear complaints about the deep cuts that the Trump administration makes US Bureau for International Development (USAID). Life will be lost, they insist.

But, curious, outside the United States, there has been an ear aid silence when it comes to this huge change in how America goes to financing various projects around the world and even some support for the changes from unlikely neighborhoods.

Take the president of Rwanda, Paul Kagame, as shocked his CNN interviewer This week by saying about the cuts to USAID, “President Trump has unconventional ways to deal with things. I totally agree with him.” When he pressed the support that his country’s people can lose, he replied, “We can learn some lessons.”

How USAID went woke up and destroyed itself

The point that Kagame makes, and it is wise, is that Africa must be more self -sufficient and not permanently a needy client state for global powers, including America. USAID and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs lose most of the approximately $ 70 billion in annual foreign support from the US, but much of USAID’s financing is transmitted directly to various groups and projects that may or may not be able to adapt to the recipient’s government.

In Hungary, President Viktor Orban has gone a step further than applauding Trump’s USAID measures. His nation makes it illegal for many anti-government organizations to accept foreign assistance from our country.

What began to be an opportunity to spread the basic American ideals of freedom and democracy turned into anti -democratic attempts to influence political change in other nations bordering imperialism.

“Now is the moment when these international networks have to be taken down, they have to be swept away,” Orban said this week, claiming that US foreign support funds have been used in attempts to “tip” their government.

Orban has a point. There is a nice line between, for example, exporting the American value of a free press by financing Hungarian news places and interfering with Hungarian elections, especially if the news is mainly nozzles for opposition parties.

President of El Salvador Nayib Bukele says that USAID is usually excluded to opposition groups. (Photo of Aphotography/Getty Images) (Photo of Aphotography/Getty Images)

The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, posted Orban’s assessment in an X -post where he wrote that most nations do not want help. “While being marketed as support for development, democracy and human rights, the majority of these funds are funneling into opposition groups, non -state organizations with political agendas and destabilizing movements.”

US foreign support serves two basic purposes. The first is economic: We buy some loyalty from developing countries with our greatness, as well as any access to their markets.

The other is informative: We get a megaphone to try to make these nations more like America and less like China.

USAID is an independent agency set up by President John F. Kennedy, but President Trump has moved to put it under State Secretary Marco Rubio. Although Rubio has Suggested deep staff cutsHe has assured the Americans that important, life -saving, financial support that is in line with US interests will be protected by his department. And few claim that we should simply turn off medical clinics or stop sending mosquito nets to Africa.

Even Kagame imagines that his continent is weaned by a need for foreign help, not really becoming cold turkey.

No, where the actual question lies for the informative purpose of foreign assistance. What began to be an opportunity to spread the basic American ideals of freedom and democracy turned into anti -democratic attempts to influence political change in other nations bordering imperialism.

In addition, the side of the Wokeness that comes with American foreign assistance today, in areas such as gender and sexuality, is not just unwelcome in many third world nations, but it can actually delay the natural development of these society against greater tolerance.

Click here for more Fox News -Lite

It is difficult for the moment to understand exactly what changes are made in foreign support. In addition to the dramatic removal of agency names on buildings and announced dismissals, it is not clear what help we keep and what we divest.

In the end, Rubio has placed himself responsible for foreign aid and the future of USAID. It is his responsibility to separate wheat from Chaff, the programs that both save lives and promote American interests, compared to those driven by Partisan ideology.

Click here to get the Fox News app

What is not acceptable to the American people, or it seems to many global leaders, is that American foreign support continues with the status quo. Trump was chosen to make concrete changes in how we influence and interact with the world.

Trump and Rubio served and deserve this chance to dramatically change and fix an aspect of our foreign policy that has been broken for decades, which has lost their mission and which has often done more harm than good.

This can be a new age for American foreign help and a much more successful.

Click here to read more from David Marcus